TE DA LA VIDA ... Etiquette
Never better title for an article.
Some time ago, a friend gave me a number of books on the Liberator Simón Bolívar. I was going through the front of the house of Bolivar, here in San Jacinto, and I found this good friend, Reinaldo, I said it was working there in the Bolivarian Society of Venezuela. I mentioned my fondness for reading and above all, on Bolivar. Hence the gift.
One of these wonderful books are devoted to commemorating the 200 anniversary of the birth of Simón Bolívar. The year was 1983, the last of Luis Herrera Campins, the father of the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency.
occasion of this celebration, Bolivarian Society of Venezuela invited a group of historians BOLIVARIAN, read well: HISTORIANS BOLIVARIAN , to take part in a cycle of conferences organized at the headquarters of this institution.
The inauguration was led by President Herrera Campins. Don Alfredo Boulton, an extraordinary Bolivarian was also part of this lecture.
And if you, my dear readers are interested in learning more about the group of historians of the time speakers, I have no problem in mentioning their names, maybe later.
But I want to get down to business. The reason for this article, is the character who wrote it and it was his contribution to the lecture in question.
and read well: I shall transcribe a paragraph of his lecture. I would transcribe it in full but will later. Lean
well: "... is necessary to design a new international legal order, to regulate the causes of wars and conflicts, this requires a new relationship between rich and poor, powerful and weak states. This involves the collection of a New International Economic Order and a bold trade cooperation where benefits can be reciprocal and poor countries can find their ways to further develop economic and social without violating their sovereignty and we believe that cooperation, negotiation, exchange, dialogue, are instruments that can overcome the conflict and confrontation. This would be the option that Latin Americans have in this hour of our singular historical event, there is convergence on the need for profound changes and build a civilization of solidarity, this historic project (that of Bolívar) is of particular importance to the people of America America and can say that the Bolivarian Doctrine is at this time a path definition and a hope. We have the immense responsibility to defeat poverty, to achieve development social economic in our people through a pluralist, democratic, deep social roots. There is a new task, to redeem the great masses of men and women who encuentarn in abject poverty, backwardness and ignorance. We believe that this task is possible, we can overcome injustice and inequality and we can carry out this historic project for the formation of a new international order. The American revolution is to be done, the Bolivarian thought challenges us. Signs of a new hemispheric policy and a different international relations are encouraging, so we must assume with courage and responsibility to deafie of PEACE. Of peace through the elimination of injustice and inequality, peace for the advancement of civilization and freedom, peace to bring about global solidarity and to outlaw any form of human bondage. Surprised the world by accepting the challenge of peace. ".
I like to be on your mind right now, because I know they will be eager to know who said these words.
The other article is interesting, and leaves aside the famous saying of the Liberator when he said at the Congress of Angostura, "The most perfect system of government is one that produces the greatest amount of happiness, the greatest amount of social security and the greatest amount of welfare."
I will allow time to guess who was the author of these words. Just remember, passed the year 1983 when this took place.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Sunday, April 26, 2009
South Park French Song On Nambla Episode
.
From a very young, my family taught me rules of courtesy, good manners, be polite, say good morning, ask for things "please, thank you, etc. I remember that for those younger days (mine) and forgive the distance, there was a book that most families owned: Famous CARREÑO Town Planning Manual.
And one of those rules said: "The person who is newly arrived to any site should be the person greetings and presents. I mean,
In the V Summit of the Americas, the U.S. President had the courtesy and made use of these good manners, as above said, and approached the President of Venezuela, a respectful way, as it should be entertaining, some MEN. And for that reason we congratulate him. It is he, Mr. Obama, who is newly arrived to the presidency of the U.S. is the new in these LIDES, therefore, I imagine it must be him who makes contact with all the countries of interest to open new operations, review old ones, and study that can improve on them and so on. Because the government of Venezuela previous government distanced itself from the U.S. by extremedamente the wrong policy of its former chairman.
(already confessed Hilary Clinton).
President Bill Clinton, when he left the White House at the end of his presidency, he left a surplus in the U.S. as had not happened in 100 years or so. And Bush left the U.S. in ruins, with an economic crisis that is affecting everyone. WORLDWIDE. Lease well. WORLDWIDE. And this, this, many people, I find it funny. Especially in my country, VENEZUELA.
media in Venezuela have been handling this situation as if our President had been the one to initiate contact with the president Obama. Nor would it have other connotations, but to welcome a new regional president with whom we have business relationships for over 150 years.
But here we have tried to distort this fact with news that put our President as "the dog with its tail between its legs" as "the handsome one who came out to put in place." As the person who approached Obama to "PULL BOL ...." etc. when what happened was the opposite. It was a gesture of the highest diplomacy between nations, and this situation was exploited by the Presdiente Chavez to give him a book to Mr. Obama, in a gesture to return the courtesy call on Mr. Obama, and thus initiate or take a first step, seeking a new relationship with a new U.S. government
So, I wonder I
Why, if it was something that everyone saw, which was broadcast on all channels in the world, because here in Venezuela, want to see that it was the opposite?
Why, here in Venezuela, President Chavez wants to be a coward, that face to face, no one dares to say the things he says about his opponents?
Why are there so many miserable looking misrepresent the publicly known facts?
But, as always, these miserable, are nothing more than that: MISERABLES. People who have no credibility. And sooner or later, your news is lost into oblivion, leaving them refresh their energies to the next lie.
AH, but those same miserable every day say that in Venezuela there is no FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
I'm just hoping that the U.S. government in the person of President Obama gives a new direction to its relations with the governments of America and above all, that relations with Venezuela will recover and rebuild, and to be handled with mutual respect we all deserve to see WHERE WILL PUT THE LANGUAGE, this whole game Miserables, that for 10 years or so, is asking the U.S. to invade Venezuela to oust the constitutional President of the Republic Bolivariana de Venezuela. SAME baseness!
From a very young, my family taught me rules of courtesy, good manners, be polite, say good morning, ask for things "please, thank you, etc. I remember that for those younger days (mine) and forgive the distance, there was a book that most families owned: Famous CARREÑO Town Planning Manual.
And one of those rules said: "The person who is newly arrived to any site should be the person greetings and presents. I mean,
In the V Summit of the Americas, the U.S. President had the courtesy and made use of these good manners, as above said, and approached the President of Venezuela, a respectful way, as it should be entertaining, some MEN. And for that reason we congratulate him. It is he, Mr. Obama, who is newly arrived to the presidency of the U.S. is the new in these LIDES, therefore, I imagine it must be him who makes contact with all the countries of interest to open new operations, review old ones, and study that can improve on them and so on. Because the government of Venezuela previous government distanced itself from the U.S. by extremedamente the wrong policy of its former chairman.
(already confessed Hilary Clinton).
President Bill Clinton, when he left the White House at the end of his presidency, he left a surplus in the U.S. as had not happened in 100 years or so. And Bush left the U.S. in ruins, with an economic crisis that is affecting everyone. WORLDWIDE. Lease well. WORLDWIDE. And this, this, many people, I find it funny. Especially in my country, VENEZUELA.
media in Venezuela have been handling this situation as if our President had been the one to initiate contact with the president Obama. Nor would it have other connotations, but to welcome a new regional president with whom we have business relationships for over 150 years.
But here we have tried to distort this fact with news that put our President as "the dog with its tail between its legs" as "the handsome one who came out to put in place." As the person who approached Obama to "PULL BOL ...." etc. when what happened was the opposite. It was a gesture of the highest diplomacy between nations, and this situation was exploited by the Presdiente Chavez to give him a book to Mr. Obama, in a gesture to return the courtesy call on Mr. Obama, and thus initiate or take a first step, seeking a new relationship with a new U.S. government
So, I wonder I
Why, if it was something that everyone saw, which was broadcast on all channels in the world, because here in Venezuela, want to see that it was the opposite?
Why, here in Venezuela, President Chavez wants to be a coward, that face to face, no one dares to say the things he says about his opponents?
Why are there so many miserable looking misrepresent the publicly known facts?
But, as always, these miserable, are nothing more than that: MISERABLES. People who have no credibility. And sooner or later, your news is lost into oblivion, leaving them refresh their energies to the next lie.
AH, but those same miserable every day say that in Venezuela there is no FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
I'm just hoping that the U.S. government in the person of President Obama gives a new direction to its relations with the governments of America and above all, that relations with Venezuela will recover and rebuild, and to be handled with mutual respect we all deserve to see WHERE WILL PUT THE LANGUAGE, this whole game Miserables, that for 10 years or so, is asking the U.S. to invade Venezuela to oust the constitutional President of the Republic Bolivariana de Venezuela. SAME baseness!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)