Friday, July 25, 2008

Funny Thing Put On A Wedding

WHO WILL BE THE COUNSELING?

In one evening, went through the TV, the repetition of what was the discussion in the National Assembly, the National Comptroller's famous law. That, which is said to not give authority to the National Controller to disqualify officials who have committed wrongful acts. It turns out that this bill was passed in 2001, when they were all awnings policies contained in the National Assembly: AD, Copei, Primero Justicia, Proyecto Venezuela, etc. And all parties present approved the law, but now it appears that the Act does not work, it now appears that the Act is unconstitutional. How can we explain this?
simply: More of the same. The opposition continues in its commitment to the sauce which is good for the kettle is not good for the turkey. That is, if the Act applies, the government is authoritarian, abuses his power, are unconstitutional actions taken by the government, this is a communist, this is a dictatorship, etc. More of the same. If the government does not apply, this is a weak government, which is falling to pieces, who can not exercise the authority, who are inept, and so on. Cuaaaaaaando
How?
Worse are those who are determined to vote for officials who are disabled. Ra .... im not all the sick! And they were yelling out there who are being denied the right to choose. Have you seen this nonsense? Or is it that I am a tremendous ignorant? I leave that papita there. Help me understand this situation.
The first question I ask is: Who is denying them their right to choose?
The second: Because they want to elect a person who committed crime against the nation? Who will
the advising? Because again suggest that no one else to vote for. When is the opposite: they have a lot of candidates, that if all pa pulling 'their own backyard. They Liliana Hernandez, Emilio GraterĂ³n, Ramon Muchacho, I think Armando Briquet withdrew when he realized he had no vote from him. There are a range of possibilities. But no, these do not work. There that voting for the disabled, have to vote for those who have unfinished business with the Venezuelan justice, we must vote for those who have committed acts of corruption. And the worst of the worst is that those who opt for public office of Mayors or Governors defend the disabled when it should be the opposite. Who will
the advising?

0 comments:

Post a Comment